Article 61: Public Buildings and Assets About To Be Seized On Merseyside?
Mayor of Liverpool on notice of 1215 Magna Carta Article 61 along with Chief Constable of Merseyside Police Andy Cooke
Both men have been alerted to the invocation of Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta and members of the public are standing under it on Merseyside in light of the Ultra Vires coronavirus lockdown. Find out all the details, view all the evidence, and watch the precedents set in 2014 when Glastonbury Town Hall was seized by a group that was standing under MC-1215-A61. Liverpool City Council properties, such as Liverpool Town Hall and St Georges Hall, and assets, are also subject to imminent action on behalf of the people of Liverpool. This process has been triggered by myself with help from people who were inside Glastonbury Town Hall as they took over it in 2014.
Watch this video to see all the grounds for taking action against elected officials who have not acted as they should be having subjected the nation to an unforgivable abuse of power. This video is classed as evidence against the alleged government, including Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, and Mayor Joe Anderson at a local level.
BONUS: Downloadable Files & Templates Regarding Article 61 And Unlawful Coronavirus Lockdown
Article 61 Process & Templates To Be Downloaded, Filled In & Sent Via Special Recorded Delivery To Obtain Proof Of Delivery Via Signature. Files Will Be Updated Regularly.
Video Courtesy Of EnchantedLifePath.com Featuring The REAL Practical Lawful Dissent Dissent and UK Column
Letter To Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, Andy Cooke
Chief Constable Andy Cooke
Merseyside Police HQ
EVIDENCE SENT IN LETTERS SENT ON JUNE 1st 2020. SIGNED FOR JUNE 2nd 2020:
Mayor Joseph Anderson, OBE – Royal Mail Delivery Reference – Click To Check Proof Of Delivery VE539863080GB
Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, Andy Cooke – Royal Mail Delivery Reference – Click To Check Proof Of Delivery VE539863076GB
Declaration and Affidavit of Truth
Further Evidence Added June 2nd 2020
Dear Chief Constable Andy Cooke,
I would like to start by commending and giving thanks to you for your service here in Liverpool, and the wider Merseyside region. I have lived in Merseyside all my life. I am an independent investigative journalist, broadcaster, and presenter from Liverpool. I am always open to new information and if that is of public interest then it triggers a passion in me that results in me doing my work in my own unique and skillful way as you may begin to see throughout this letter. I have a great desire for information and presenting my research to the public via my media platform, Enchanted LifePath Alternative News & Media. I am on record many times recently stating how I have admired Merseyside Police during the alleged government’s lockdown and I think you have led by example when dealing with the public in our region in a very confusing and emotionally distressing time for us all. I have contacted Merseyside Police numerous times during the lockdown and had very uplifting, and polite conversations on each occasion. Merseyside Police treated the residents better during lockdown than I have ever seen and it was refreshingly different to not hear sirens from emergency vehicles or helicopter as much as usual. I think we all did very well collectively as a city to cope with what has been pushed onto us all. You are also a credit to your friends and family who have also felt the same fears as discussed in this letter.
I genuinely feel the police have been put in a horrible situation in 2020 and have handled it brilliantly. I must raise the issues of the now ongoing George Floyd protests that are creeping up around the country gives me a perfect chance to explain my stance on the events in the United Kingdom right now and why my approach is much more sensible, diplomatic, lawful, clever, calculated and can be done with a pen and some paper, or in my case here, a computer.
As you read about how I am standing in lawful dissent to the alleged government in regards to the coronavirus lockdown guidelines, you will see how Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta is a positive step for our city and one that even the police may be interested in listening to. I am going to make some sense out of people in government and the community seemingly losing control by the day. I am a person who loves to analyse situations, look for patterns, spot social trends, and why they happen, etc. I have over 5 years of experience in independent, investigative journalism. A lot of that time has been a learning curve for me. Even today I am still learning how to do all aspects of what I do, still seeking new information by the minute.
One thing I have learned lately is of a protection clause that is written into our constitutional law. It is in place to protect every man, woman, and child from a tyrannical government, or monarchy.
The protection clause is Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta. This was invoked on March 23, 2001. This means the nation is in a lawful state of dissent anyway. The highest law in the country right now is Article 61 MC 1215 and it has been since it’s invocation. It is the law to stand under it and the crown or government has no authority whilst it is invoked. All we have to do is stand under Article 61, which gives the people the power to arrest, strip assets from, indict, and put those on trial who do wrong by the public whilst acting in the name of the government. This law supersedes any statues that allegedly govern the nation. The laws that we are placed under are unlawful. All laws and government actions have been unlawful since March 23, 2001, and this can not be denied. If you can provide evidence that I am wrong then I would be very eager to see it. This gives us all a chance to stand together under Article 61 and remove the imposter government who are acting in Ultra Vires (out of authority) to make life difficult for us all this year.
I see protests in London for George Floyd, this saddens me as we have all had our rights trampled all over and most of the country never batted an eyelid. The government must see each protester as another person who thinks the government holds any authority, they must find it hilarious. It shows the deep levels of psychological manipulation the public have fallen victim to. This is something I will get back to later, in detail, and with government level documentation that proves my claims in that regard.
When Boris Johnson announced lockdown and the State of Emergency, I noticed something in the seconds after the Prime Minister stopped addressing the nation that night in March 2020. It was a police statement that instantly followed which advised the government to be sensible about what they were doing and how the police had received no guidance on how to enforce new measures onto the public. I sensed the police were not in full agreement if any. The statement said the guidance risked harming public relations with police.
Now, weeks later, in London, we see police horses attacked over something that happened in another continent, another set of policing laws and in another government’s constitution. Sadly I feel it has little to do with the UK, we have bigger issues on our plate with the current unlawful government.
I hope I never see behaviour like this in Liverpool and point to the great relationship that Merseyside Police has always had with locals in times when groups, such as Antifa, have made moves here in the past we have shown great unity to tell them where to go to put it nicely.
I would love Merseyside police to go one better and stand alongside every law-abiding subject of the crown in recognition of the security clause in Lawful dissent under Article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215.
I think this is a way to open dialect and put forward my standing under Article 61, and request that key figures in the city I grew up in are to stand with me. If we are in fear of major changes taking place such as the council going into bankruptcy then we need to unite for a greater cause and we can be the city that educates people on the rule of law. This will show how it is much better than what we are seeing around the world with violent rioting taking place over in America and here in the UK. If Mayor Joseph Anderson is so concerned about the future of our city, he should consider standing under article 61 to show his ultimate disapproval of the government treatment of Merseyside. It is, after all, his duty to do so, which is my main point here.
All we have to do to end a lot of the troubles is agree to stand under the true rule of law, and not the unlawful statutes within the legal system that you mostly operate under. You must understand they are void and I will present the evidence shortly.
I feel if we are all united under Article 61, the true rule of law, then we as a city can make a massive statement to the rest of the country. We can do it peacefully and end with celebrations. We can set an example to all local councils around the country, and police forces would grow in popularity instantly.
As you may not be aware, I hope these facts may be of assistance;
A number of people have been working in the Glastonbury area to lobby their Councillors and Police Constabulary, for years now.
The group lawfully seized Glastonbury’s local town hall, on October 15, 2014. This was done under Article 61 Magna Carta 1215, due to lack of response after Lobbying their local Councillors at the time, and the Chief Inspector, Inspector Nicholson, who also did not respond. The group believes this information may not have been shared with his team, due to the fact when local police arrived at the town hall, they obviously had no knowledge of the invocation of said article.
Video: UK Column Reporting On The Seizure Of Glastonbury Town Hall From 15th 22nd October 2014
Thankfully, after assessing the situation at the local town hall, Glastonbury Constabulary agreed the group was not breaking the law, and they were left alone to decide upon their options.
The group decided it was appropriate and more practical to leave the building, as one of the Constables, or PCSOs mentioned how the building being seized was now on record, with Avon and Somerset Constabulary.
The video below shows how peaceful the action was and the police did recognise it as lawful. The group were very well mannered and they are in direct contact with myself and assisting me on the subject. This again will give you a better insight into my intent and anybody who may see this information is also in full knowledge of how this is a standing of good will.
I would hope after I make you aware of the invocation of Article 61, that you will then ensure all Merseyside Police are notified that it is in effect in Liverpool and any actions by me or any member of society takes under lawful dissent would be peaceful and lawful. Any police interference would be deemed as misprision of treason after the whole of Merseyside police has been made aware of Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta and the treasonous acts taking place in the United Kingdom since March 23, 2001, including the Coronavirus 2020 Act.
I hold Glastonbury Police in high regard after they allowed the lawful seizing of Glastonbury Town Hall to take place on October 15, 2014, and I would expect the same understanding from and Merseyside Police, Liverpool City Council, Mayor Joseph Anderson, OBE, after making you and Mayor Anderson aware of this information.
After this cover letter, I have enclosed a Notice of Lawful Objection & Standing which has requirements for your attention. This is on the grounds of local, and national government co-operation in the 2020 coronavirus lockdown that has resulted in the Ultra Vires removal of the inalienable rights of every man, woman, and child who you are in service to represent and protect.
Mayor Joseph Anderson recently stated that Liverpool City Council is close to declaring bankruptcy due to a lack of government funding for the local council during the alleged COVID-19 outbreak.
Merseyside Police and Mayor Joseph Anderson have been long-standing advocates and authority of government policies enforced on the population of Liverpool, as have Liverpool City Council. The lack of scrutiny to the enforcement of lockdown laws/guidance/advice, that has cost millions of people their livelihood and businesses is a great of great public concern nationwide. The same applies here on Merseyside.
Your affiliation with Mayor Joseph Anderson was highlighted in the Liverpool Echo on April 24, 2020, as they published an article with joint statements from yourself and Joe Major (as he is known on Merseyside).
In the article, it states: In a stark warning that failure to stick to the restrictions will put lives in danger, Mayor Anderson said: “It may seem anti-social but it’s pro-life.”
It goes on to quote yourself in telling people to stay at home to save lives. This is advice I wish Dominic Cummings and Neil Ferguson had followed before controversy surrounded their actions during the lockdown.
The article continues:
And Mr Cooke, chief constable of Merseyside Police, said his officers will take action where necessary.
He added: “These are unprecedented and challenging times for all of us, but we all have loved ones and we need to think about them and understand the danger we are putting ourselves, and our loved ones, in.”
I think my praise of Merseyside Police has been justified by the release of police statistics on arrests or fines handed out during enforced lockdown and as suspected, our region was in the lower proportions of enforcement action figures nationwide and, once again, well done on how well you respected our feelings.
Merseyside Police were not even mentioned in this article about an apparent game of postcode lottery taking place regarding the handing out of fines in respect of the lockdown regulations.
I do feel Merseyside locals policed themselves well over the course of the lockdown when there was clearly less police on the streets and crime must have dropped. Although obvious reasons come to mind, it must be pointed out that the people of Liverpool and the wider area did show that we can be trusted.
It is statistics that brings me to my next points that I will make whilst embedding them within three questions.
You can see the diagrams below to see the evidence or reason contained within my questions. All images link through to original sources that I have also archived in the Wayback Machine when relevant.
According to statistics, Liverpool had 1467 alleged cases of COVID-19 as of May 4, 2020. This is in a local population of 494,814 and a metropolitan population of 902.000. Out of the alleged 1467 cases, only 381 deaths have been reported/recorded. This gives us a fatality percentage of between 0.04 and 0.07 (based on the two population figures). The death rate on Merseyside is extremely low. My first question is, do these statistics warrant the city being in a state of emergency with a rate of just 82 deaths per 100.000 inhabitants?
Liverpool Echo report just 381 Merseyside deaths as of May, 2nd, 2020.
Next is the percentages.
The alleged COVID-19 outbreak is due to result in Liverpool council announcing likely measures are in place to begin declaring the city bankrupt. Should the people of Liverpool (or any other UK city) trust or follow, an unlawful government’s guidelines that have added to already widespread austerity?
See Liverpool Echo reports from April 30 quoting Mayor Joseph Anderson, OBE, below.
Should the military have built these temporary testing locations in our city when people are out of work and at the rates of the alleged infection in the city should we even be building them anyway, and if so why were the roles not going to local people?
The following video presents a thorough investigation into the statistics from the government bodies that are controlling the agenda behind lockdown here in the UK and abroad. I do feel that authority is getting carried away with its official reporting on these subjects and the same authority, including all related elements, such as the emergency services, most notably the police and media, maybe show a lack of professional respect (put nicely) towards members of the public who have key skills in many aspects including research and investigatory intellect. Given your investigative personality, I fully expect you to find much of the information provided by the government as an insult to your intelligence. The video below, by Andrew mather at Peerless Reads, just like many of my reports and articles, goes into enormous detail that is viewed (by himself, and I agree fully) as even more evidence.
Video: Covid-19 FBI Take Note: John Hopkins University promoting false meme
Andrew writes in his video description:
There can be no more important theme or meme to Covid-19 than “Flattening the Curve”. It is what justifies lockdown, the cancellation of democracy, the shutdown of non-government workers’ ability to earn (without any commensurate sacrifice by government workers). It is in short the Fundamental Premise of Covid-19 Response. So when John Hopkins presents an absurd and massively inappropriate definition of ‘flattening the curve’ that has no regard for science, epidemiology or maths, you have to wonder why they deserve their reputation. Or perhaps the truth is just the first victim in war: but last time I checked, it’s not the virus that reads and pays attention to John Hopkins.
The lack of transparency around the scientific advice from SAGE, that the government and Prime Minister are allegedly following is also a huge red flag.
This is backed up by Simon Dolan’s call for a judicial review of what is viewed as a ruinous lockdown.
Simon Dolan’s solicitor filed over 1000 pages of documents with the High Court against Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, who is named on (alleged) lockdown laws, along with Gavin Williamson, the Secretary of State for Education who has endorsed the closure of schools and universities.
I have been following Simon Dolan’s Twitter profile daily and his views gain tons of support from all around the United Kingdom, this shows public opinion of the government’s actions in 2020 is not as positive as portrayed by bias news outlets.
Simon has also highlighted how death certificates are being fraudulently filed with incorrect information by untrained personnel. He points out the case with care home residents and how they have been treated in a way that can is the stuff of nightmares. All of this has made a psychological impact on the nation and it is unforgivable.
Many families have been ruined by the lockdown and lack of care, lives lost, and also financial loss as COVID-19 on a death certificate renders life insurance policies void. I must ask for these issues to be investigated by police along with serious crime and fraud squads.
Simon Dolan’s solicitor, Francis Hoar has also spoken out against the lockdown calling it unlawful many times. I must ask, if so many well respected, professionall witnesses calling this out as unlawful and harmful to the masses then how can our police forces stand by and take orders from a tyrannical government who seem to be more interested in bill Gates money than the health and well-being of the population they are in pace to serve?
Francis is very open in his criticism of the regulations as can be seen below and on many articles that he has written on the subject.
I do respect that Simon Dolan’s case is still an ongoing (legal) process but the feeling towards the severity of the issue is shared by myself. I am writing to you from a Lawful standing under Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta.
The handling of the NHS during the alleged COVID-19 outbreak has also been very concerning with a duty of care removed from millions of patients. Vital treatments suspended, or outright removed in many cases resulting illness and deaths that could have been prevented.
YouTube Video: “COVID-19 A Plea For Our Lives” Care Patient Is “Scared” Of New Guidelines – Sad Sign Of The Times
The public has been subjected to ongoing psychological tactics that have resulted in many people suffering clear elements of trauma-based mind control as key members of government, including Boris Johnson, appear to have been coercing the masses to comply with unlawful demands. Social engineering and emotional manipulation have played a large role in the lives of men, women and children all around the United Kingdom.
I say appear lightly as I can prove it using documents from the government website regarding SAGE minutes at meetings that have dictated our freedoms without consent.
This lockdown has been enforced with the help of daily political broadcasts and media productions that can easily be viewed as propaganda. This can be further highlighted in the SPI-B report from SAGE on the UK.Gov website titled: Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures (22 March 2020).
The report openly shows how SAGE meetings contained discussions about ramping up the fear over the general public using the media to shape our perception. My concerns can not be denied as the SAGE meetings, minutes were released to the public as part of Simon Dolan’s case against the government.
The table below shows the government discussing emotional and psychological tactics to engineer society using our feelings against each other. Other delivery systems of this abuse that are highlighted are media and social media.
The definition of the word coercion itself tells the public that we are under attack from an out of control, tyrannical government.
For coercion to be mentioned on the documents backs up my claims that the public has been subjected to a government acting in Ultra Vires without any care for the law that governs them. They continue to act above the law and I do not see the government being held to official account in a reasonable enough way at any level whatsoever. Any cases against the government lockdown are independent cases. I require you to declare your standing under article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta and take action against those committing treason with an instant.
These issues are well documented and oublicly known due to the information first being reported by UK column on May 14, 2020.
Uk Column article published by Mike Robinson Thursday, 14th May 2020
This city (Liverpool) is under duress and that is proven by the alarming claims from Mayor Joseph Anderson when highlighting the bankruptcy issues facing Liverpool City Council in the local and national press.
Privacy issues with tracking and tracing are ignored under the cloak of COVID-19. This is also not acceptable without full scrutiny of all data. We need a full independent inquest into the technologies, applications, regulations and planned vaccinations. This also applies to the reduced ability for the public to work or travel freely. It is also disturbing that we can not go a day without having to meet certain criteria within a COVID-19 controlled environment to enjoy the freedoms we have all grown up with. Merseyside Police and Liverpool City Council websites and social media pages contain the same constant reminders that I have just highlighted. People’s loved ones, their nearest and dearest have suffered the consequences of Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Council assets/buildings being peacefully seized is something the Merseyside area is facing in the near future.
I make my intentions clear that this is peaceful. This is about educating the general public on the true meaning of law and their rights that have been taken away in 2020. My actions in standing under Article 61 are lawful, and with care, bringing no injury, harm, or loss. I think you have a real chance to help make the biggest POSITIVE impact on society this country has ever seen. Many people in this region do not agree with the government on the methods used to contain the alleged lockdown and I think it would be massive to see you declare your standing under Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta and enforce the law in its true form and help educate the corrupt establishments and the unknowing public on the true rule of law that we the people truly stand under. I am here to give you the chance to sit for a moment as you read and imagine your self being the one who helped to break the mold, respect for police would quadruple all around the country as mentioned earlier. There is a big difference between Lawful and Legal. It is a crime under the rule of law to see treason take place or Ultra Vires actions from a tyrannical government and it’s deceptive politicians, and not take action. This is why I am taking action, I see major crimes against humanity taking place and the people of England are victims of their own government.
Other critics of current events are doing great work in documenting the failings of the Prime Minister and his government along with infamous advisors.
Many people from the legal system have spoken out or began communications with members of the governemnt regarding concerns over the legitimacy of the lockdown. Another person to speak out is Jo Maugham who posted an article on Twitter from The Good Law Project who have instructed ROOK IRWIN SWEENEY LLP solicitors to contact Mr Hancock.
The Good Law Project are not happy with how Parliament has been overlooked whilst passing what is described in the letter as “draconian measures”. They remind Hancock how ministers are to be held accountable by law. An opinion I share greatly. Why do we seem to have a government in control who see themselves as above the law?
“Ministers are accountable to Parliament through such mechanisms
as their duty to answer Parliamentary questions and to appear before
Parliamentary committees, and through Parliamentary scrutiny of
the delegated legislation which ministers make. By these means, the
policies of the executive are subjected to consideration by the
representatives of the electorate, the executive is required to report,
explain and defend its actions, and citizens are protected from the
arbitrary exercise of executive power. [emphasis added]
You can read the full letter here or by clicking the image below.
Another person to write to Matt Hancock is the Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, David Norgrove who raised his concerns in a series of letters between the which began on May 11, 2020.
David Norgrove is suspicious of the COVID-19 testing statistics and how they are being counted. You can read the full letter here or by clicking the image below.
Another well-respected critic of the unlawful lockdown regulations is former Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption who has spoken out on the civil liberties violations posed by the coronavirus lockdown. Lord Sumption has come under fire for becoming a political voice when law and politics are allegedly meant to stay set aside. Mr. Sumption is on record as saying he speaks as a member of the public to raise his concerns against the actions of the government.
Test and Trace issues around data privacy invasions based on the back of a dubious pandemic are also a major concern as shown in a complaint from Open Rights Group who instructed AWO solicitors to raise the issue with the ICO. The ICO upholds information rights in the public interest, promotes openness by public bodies & data privacy for individuals. https://ico.org.uk
8:02 AM · Jun 4, 2020 – Breaking: Instructed by @OpenRightsGroup, we have filled a complaint with @ICOnews about breaches of GDPR in deployment of Test and Trace. We have also written to NHS, NHSX and PHE to clarify concerns re data sharing, 20 year retention period etc. Story:
Advice to keep two metres apart while social distancing was ‘conjured up out of nowhere’, a government adviser has claimed.
Metro reports on April 25, 2020.
Robert Dingwall, of the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG), says there has ‘never been a scientific basis for two metres’, naming it a ‘rule of thumb’. NERVTAG is an expert committee of the Department of Health (DH) that feeds into the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), which is advising the cabinet on the country’s coronavirus response. Speaking to Radio 4 on Saturday, Mr Dingwall said: ‘We cannot sustain [social distancing measures] without causing serious damage to society, to the economy and to the physical and mental health of the population.
‘I think it will be much harder to get compliance with some of the measures that really do not have an evidence base. I mean the two-metre rule was conjured up out of nowhere.’ He added: ‘Well, there is a certain amount of scientific evidence for a one-metre distance which comes out of indoor studies in clinical and experimental settings. ‘There’s never been a scientific basis for two metres, it’s kind of a rule of thumb. But it’s not like there is a whole kind of rigorous scientific literature that it is founded upon.’
One website that has collected over 20.000 signatures is the Free Peoples Alliance.
WE ASK THAT YOU ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ISSUES WITHOUT DELAY AND RE-OPEN OUR COUNTRY
We are told government strategy is based on scientific advice, yet scientists and experts across the world continue to express disagreement with the UK’s adopted course, why?
Standard scientific method is not being applied
THE COVID-19 INFECTION TESTING PROCEDURES ARE FLAWED
There is a big question mark over the validity of the testing procedures being used to determine infection, particularly the RT PCR tests that were originally invented by Kary Mullis in 1985. This is the same test used to diagnose lung cancer. The inventor of this test said the RT PCR test should not be used for diagnosing infectious disease because it was not an accurate test in this situation.
Viruses are verified by using Koch’s Postulates of which four conditions must be met – COVID-19 does not meet any of them. The second step to isolate the virus, has not been done – how therefore can we accurately test for it – see Dr Thomas Cowan [Ref 2]
The tests for infection are not accurate and standard scientific procedures for identifying the virus have not been followed, how can we trust the statistics relating to these tests.
Dr Andrew Kaufman and MIT Graduate on this test procedure shows that the accuracy of the tests is unknown and reports an 80% false positive rate. This is because the RT PCR test is testing for RNA genetic material, not the COVID-19 because the COVID-19 virus has not been purified and isolated. [Ref 1]
May we ask Professor Chris Whitty two questions – if the virus has not been purified and isolated as per Step 2 of Koch’s postulates, how exactly are you:
- Testing for the virus using the RT PCR test
- Developing a vaccine for the virus
The antibody test to determine if one has previously been infected does appear to have validity.
THE STATISTICS ARE IN ERROR AND MUST BE REVIEWED
- They only include those tested in hospitals / care workers.
- Do not include those without significant symptoms who would have tested positive.
- Deaths are being attributed to COVID-19 when the large majority of deaths are from underlying conditions.
Thus infection rates are understated and consequently mortality rates are grossly overstated.
Furthermore the inaccuracy of the RT PCR testing procedures which produces very high false positive results, means that many patients with underlying health conditions are tested and get a false positive read and if they don’t survive, it is attributed to COVID-19 even when they were not infected – this is again falsely inflating the mortality rates by including people not infected.
How can the Test Contact Trace Self Isolate strategy work when you have such a high percentage of false positive results – it will just create fear and confusion and stop uninfected people from working and will delay lifting the lockdown.
In addition, Senator Dr Rand Paul points out that US statistics show infection rates are significantly higher than reported, thus confirming that mortality rates have been vastly inflated. [Ref 3] confirmed by Dr Erickson [Ref 20]
We are all being led down a garden path.
Since 1st Jan 2020 to 17 April 2020 we have had a 12% increase in deaths compared with cumulative average of the previous 5 years in England and Wales.
From 1st March 2020 to 17 April 2020 we have had a 35% increase in deaths compared with average of the previous 5 years in England and Wales.
For the 16 week period from 1st January to 17 April 2020 death rates are 8,368 more than they were in 2018 – yet we have closed down the UK.
There are several factors at play here, yes there has been an increase in recent weeks, but the question is what are the causes? And will this represent a significant increase over a 6 to 12 month period?
Several factors are contributing to an increased death rate:
- There appears to be a virus of some sort, though we do not believe it is of the same level of magnitude as reported by the government or the mainstream media and certainly does not warrant closing down the county.
- How many people have died because their serious underlying health conditions were not diagnosed, operated on or treated because normal medical services have been suspended on the grounds that the COVID-19 requires dedicating all hospital resources to it. This has contributed significantly to the increase in numbers and they will nevertheless be counted as having died of COVID-19 – many surviving relatives have been very upset about this as they know COVID-19 was not the cause of death.
- How many people with underlying conditions have died because they were afraid to go to the hospital for fear of catch COVID-19.
- Being told you have COVID19 when you haven’t, when you have underlying conditions can be devastating and will accelerate your demise – our beliefs about our health have an extremely powerful effect on our health, e.g. placebo effect – the flawed false positive RT PCR test results are acting as a negative placebo on an otherwise uninfected person. COVID-19 is increasing deaths rates without actually infecting people
- Covid-19 is dangerous to those with a compromised or weak immune system. Stress, fear and panic is being created by the media and the government all weaken the immune system. Love and support strengthen the immune system, social distancing and the denial of love and human contact weakens the immune system.
- The misery and indignity caused to those with underlying health conditions and compromised immune systems that have been denied the love and support of their families either in hospital or in care homes.
- The continual bombardment with notices and subliminal messages everywhere about the need to stay at home, protect the NHS and save lives – this continues to create stress, fear and panic.
- Lockdown causing the loss of millions of jobs and the destruction of thousands of businesses that people have laboured at for years to build up cause huge stress and fear.
HOSPITALS “COMPLETELY OVERWHELMED” DUE TO COVID-19
In many cases this simply isn’t true.
In fact, we have had reports about many hospitals around the UK and not one of them is overwhelmed.
The new Nightingale Hospital in London – still has thousands of available beds and winding down
The new Nightingale Hospital in Birmingham – has no patients
Mayday Hospital, Croydon London – very quiet
Princes Royal Hospital Haywards Heath – very quiet
Fairfield General Hospital, Bury near Manchester – has 2 full wards dedicated for COVID-19 with only 6 beds in use and no patients on ventilators
Hereford County Hospital – has been very quiet and they keep sending staff home
Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey – almost empty
Kingsmill Hospital in Sutton – about quarter full, usually overflowing
Southend hospital – very quiet, lots of ambulances outside idle, the staff laughing and sitting in the sun drinking pop and chatting. No PPE.
Basildon Hospital – was literally heaving before lockdown, but now are only half full. The majority of issues is due to staff shortages as so many are self isolating! You’ve only got to have a family member with a sniffle and you get 14 days off!
Folkstone Hospital – went for blood test and it was empty
Morriston hospital in Swansea – running under 40% capacity
Lancaster Hospital – not busy at all
There is a big discrepancy between what we are being told and what is actually happening.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST?
“Integrity,objectivity, accountability, transparency, honesty and leadership in the public interest – must be honored at all times”
Professor Chris Whitty
Professor Chris Whitty appears to have vested interests in vaccines and mentions no viable alternatives.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation handed him $40 million for malaria research, so Professor Chris Whitty is very much under the influence of Bill Gates and is pursuing the implementation of his vaccination program. [Ref 10]
Professor Whitty has never suggested the obvious first step of boosting the immune system with inexpensive vitamins A, C & D or using the hydroxychloroquine protocol as reported successfully in France, New York and elsewhere. [Ref 16] [Ref 17] [Ref 18] [Ref 19] [Ref 4] [Ref 5]
Professor Whitty is ignoring both of these very important factors.
Also appears to have vested interest in a big pharma solution, and with his Babylon Health involvement.
Matt Hancock has been accused of breaching the ministerial code over his promotion of Babylon Health [Ref 11]
Shadow health minister Justin Madders wrote to your predecessor, Theresa May, accusing Hancock of repeatedly endorsing the commercial products of a company that receives NHS funds for every patient it treats.
The BBC and others have reported on Matt Hancock wanting to make vaccinations compulsory, which would be a further erosion of our human rights and freedoms.
Matt Hancock has never suggested the obvious first step of boosting the immune system with inexpensive vitamins A, C & D or using the hydroxychloroquine protocol as reported successfully in France, New York and elsewhere. [Ref 16] [Ref 17] [Ref 18] [Ref 19] [Ref 4] [Ref 5]
Matt Hancock similarly is ignoring both of these very important factors.
Bill Gates and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill Gates is now the largest donor to the WHO, now that the US has pulled their funding.
“He also has much financial influence over UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, and also funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy, often scurrilously dismissing people’s genuine concerns and also much expert opinion as “conspiracy theories” and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.”
These comments were made by Robert F Kennedy Jr. [Ref 21]
Gates has a publicly declared intent on getting everyone quantum stamped, chipped and tracked on a large digital database grid, similar to what is being done in China – mandatory vaccinations are the route he is pursuing to progress this plan.
Gates has poured £Ms into Imperial College London ($14.5M 2018), who provided the COVID-19 mathematical model forecasts that were wrong, but which would support his agenda. Gates has, through this funding, an inordinate influence on the college.
On 26 March 2020 Gates’ Microsoft filed a patent for a body-interfaced crypto currency. A human body implanted microchip connected to a cloud computer system, harvesting biometric data. You can see the patent in the reference section [Ref 13]
The UK is a free country and our citizens are free people. Such programmes that egregiously violate the basic human rights of its citizens will inevitably alienate the government from its people and lead in the long or short term to serious civil unrest.
We did not vote you in as Prime Minister to have our human rights violated and taken away
THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (WHO)
Why does the fact that the US has dumped WHO/CDC/Gates mathematical models because they were wrong, appear to have been completely ignored by the media and in the briefings and we continue to follow the WHO/CDC/Imperial College models?
The WHO’s advice has been so wrong that that the US halted funding to the WHO – again this is never mentioned.
Now that the US have stopped funding the WHO, the largest funder of the WHO is Bill Gates who is pursuing a programme of enforced vaccination and quantum stamping which would be a fundamental breach of our human rights.
The WHO are headed by Tedros Adhanom who has no medical degree, he was once part of a listed terrorist organization and when Health minister of Ethiopia was accused of covering up a cholera epidemic. He oversaw the great Ethiopian famine where 8.6 million starved and when Foreign minister was accused of torture of opponents including British citizen Andy Tsege. [Ref 15]
Why is the government closely following the WHO guidelines when they have been so wrong and have been been dumped by the US
End of F.P.A Letter recite.
Merseyside has been subject to £Billions of funding that has been funneled into the medical-industrial complex that has been built within the United Kingdom over the past few years. Every major player is mentioned in this article from Bill Gates to GlaxoSmithKline, World Health Organisation, CSL, Bayer Corporation, The Department of Health (UK) (NIHR), NHS Trust Merseyside, Alder Hey Hospital, Liverpool Tropical School of Medicine, PATH, Imperial College London, Multiple Universities, including Liverpool University, and more. This has been welcomed by many key figures on Merseyside including Mayor Joe Anderson who praised the investments that have been pumped into Seqirus Vaccines in Speke, a large vaccination manufacturing plant that has formerly been known as, Evans Vaccines, Novartis Vaccines, Chiron Vaccines, and Elnery No. 1979 LTD. For the most part, these companies have been linked to mass production of vaccines that have often led to severe scandals. Bill Gates has his fingerprints all over these operations and organisations. I proved it by making over 45 connections between Gates and Merseyside in the article below.
Major Conflicts Of Interest As Liverpool Is Bill Gates’ Biotechnology Powerhouse – Over 45 Connections Made – Wuhan & Liverpool Vaccine Labs – Coronavirus 2014/15 Alder Hey Study – Alfie Evans Test Run and More..
I want to show you how the new NHS Nightingale Hospital, in London, is also connected to companies with links to 788-790 Finchley Road.
The pop-up, military hospital was opened in record time after it was brought in to the government’s insane war on COVID-19. The 4000-bed complex is over 1km long. It features its own morgue and incinerator inline with the new Coronavirus bill, cremation regulations.
The hospital was opened by Prince Charles via video links with the current covert leader of the United Kingdom, Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, present onsite.
The hospital had a planning permission application accepted by Newsham Council after it was made by DP9 LTD on behalf of the London International Exhibition Centre PLC, who own the ExCel center that Nightingale was built in. The owners and directors are a 70-person list of Sultans, Politicians, Lords, and big-wigs. The majority of the names that stand out the most are from the United Arab Emirates. This shows a lot people are set to benefit from this deal, but it does not end there.
Video from April, 13, showing Finchley Road connection to planning permission before the application documented was made unavailable by the Newham Council website.
The planning application can be seen below and it does link through to the original source before the file was later found to be unavailable on the Newham council website after initial Enchanted LifePath reports on the connection.
The next screenshot shows DP9 listed as the agents who handled the application in regards to the NHS Nightingale Hospital. Ther application was made on March 26, 2020.
Next, you can see DP9 LTD on Companies House, they are, of course, an active company.
DP9 were another company that was started up by directors from 788-790 Finchley Road. We see 21 officers with 7 resignations. Two of the named entities on the DP9 LTD records are Temple Secretaries and Company Directors Limited. Both are registered at 788-790.
We can see many sources of information regarding the 788-790 Finchley Road scandal in the public domain. The elites of the world, from Royalty to Former Prime Ministers are named in allegations surrounding the abandoned premises that holds the key to a £Billion, organised crime network. The fact that such a global fraud has taken place by people within the walls of Westminster, this may have left the door open for our government to be blackmailed into making certain decisions such as these we are seeing with the alleged COVID-19 outbreak.
I feel Merseyside Police and the Mayor of Liverpool can help key staff at any of the public buildings that may be seized, to find ways to continue providing themselves an income, such as continuing to work from home as they have in recent weeks and months.
It is to my understanding that I have a lawful excuse to seize any public building and assets whilst Article 61, of Magna Carta 1215 is in effect, and that anyone who opposes me will be committing at minimum, sedition, and likely high treason at common law. I demand that you observe the facts and stand under Article 61 yourself instantly. Remember, if you do not act on treason it would be classed as sedition, therefore, I expect you to instruct police constables/officers/enforcers to arrest anybody who does not stand under Artice 61 whilst they are in knowledge of its invocation. This will allow me or any member of the public to carry out duties under Article 61 without interference.
Given the urgency in the matter, you have just seven (7) days to reply after this Notice of Lawful Objection and cover letter is signed for at the address stated above when it will be classed as delivered to you. Your knowledge of Article 61 in Liverpool, and Merseyside will be deemed instant and anyone doing business at Merseyside Police and Liverpool City Council will also be classed as on notice.
My intention is to place Liverpool back in the hands of the people, I will make Liverpool great again and you have a big chance to stand on the true side of the law join the city of Liverpool in Lawful Dissent.
And so with good faith, I now send you a copy of a Notice Of Lawful Objection, as well as this covering letter, as a means to engage with Merseyside Police and key figures at our local Councils.
I look forward to your response to these matters, as do many others due to the current situation we find ourselves in at the moment in this realm.
End of cover letter.
NOTICE OF LAWFUL OBJECTION & DECLARATION OF STANDING IN LAW
I stand under the tenets of Article 61, Magna Carta 1215 since the invocation of Article 61 on March 23, 2001.
Maxim: ”Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a sworn officer of the law.”
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.
Dear Chief Constable Andy Cooke,
I am writing to you on the understanding that you are the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police.
Whereas I, in 2020, did swear an Oath of Allegiance to the Committee of the Baron’s whom invoked Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta on the 23rd March 2001 (see exhibit A & B) and, that I declare to be standing entirely under English and Commonwealth Common law with lawful excuse; to stand in defence of the realm against High Treason; and against those who may seek, or be seeking to extort/force unlawful gain from me at this time, or at any future time whilst Article 61 remains in effect, by attempting to coerce me into breaching the Common laws and customs of the land and my sworn Oath or Declaration of Allegiance.
Therefore I am hereby putting you Chief Constable Andy Cooke, on full Notice of my standing under the truth in law, in order to prevent a future breach of the peace or crime from occurring.
I therefore need to know in written form by return of post, whereas you have a lawful obligation and duty of care as a public servant to respond promptly and in good faith to this Notice with any objection to my Lawful standing whatsoever you may have? and if you do have any objection then to provide in substance exactly what your objection(s) may be. Maxim: ”Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a sworn officer of the law.”
Please be aware that the 1215 Magna Carta – Article 61 thereof, has not been publicly revoked by the Committee of the Barons since its invocation, therefore its evident invocation on said date still stands in effect to this very day, and that if Magna Carta itself had been repealed (which is the standard government lie and rhetoric) as the diverse traitors within Westminster do state, then the over-thrown (by treasonous means) and or deposed (by entirely legitimate Constitutional law means in 2001) “Queen” Elizabeth II, would not have responded to the barons petition served on her on 7th day of February 2001, at noon (see exhibit B).
Also, if the 1215 Magna Carta had been truly repealed then we would not have celebrated Magna Carta’s 800th anniversary on the 15th June in 2015; coins were also minted in its commemoration in the same year; Elizabeth II also referred to Magna Carta 1215 in 2015, in writing to the Australian people’s she stating that;
“The story of the British monarchy is intertwined with that of Runnymede and Magna Carta. The values of Magna Carta are not just important to the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth, but across the world. Its principles are significant and enduring.”
(Valentine Low. “Picnic by the river marks Magna Carta’s 800 years of equality and rule of law” The Times. (2015, late ed)
It can also clearly be seen that a response to the Barons’ petition did occur on the 39th day of the 40 days that were provided by law for a reply to to be received, and, that it left the Barons’ Committee no choice under English and Commonwealth law but to invoke Article 61 as they did so on said date.
“I am commanded by The Queen to reply to your letter of 23rd March and the accompanying petition to Her Majesty about the Treaty of Nice” – (Sir Robin Janvrin Private secretary to Her Majesty The Queen);
“The Queen continues to give this issue her closest attention. She is well aware of the strength of feeling which European Treaties, such as the Treaty of Nice, cause. As a constitutional sovereign, Her Majesty is advised by her Government who supports this Treaty.
As I am sure you know, the Treaty of Nice cannot enter force until it has been ratified by all Member States and in the United Kingdom this entails the necessary legislation being passed by Parliament.”
Moreover, we did not celebrate the 1297 statute version of Magna Carta in 1997, so a little common sense is all that is required to disprove the propaganda espoused by the successive, Treasonous administration(s); the alleged “representatives” of the people.
Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 came into effect on the 23rd day of March 2001 because of the High Treason evidently committed by Prime Minister Anthony Charles Lynton Blair who signed the Treasonous EU Treaty of ‘Nice’ on the 26th January 2001. I have supplied herein a transcript of the petition of the barons, which includes within its address the evidence pertaining to the treasonous aspects of the Treaty of Nice (See exhibit B).
Moreover, It is not the people’s fault that the Barons’ Committee were forced by law to invoke the security clause of Magna Carta 1215 in 2001. It is to my understanding that we MUST ALL by ROYAL COMMAND abide by Constitutional law (clause 61 of Magna Carta 1215).
I am an honourable law-abiding subject who stands assertively by the truth in order to protect the common laws and customs of the land and to also defend my unalienable rights as a sovereign Woman of the Realm.
Furthermore, Treason evidence is also supplied herein which proves undeniably that Edward Heath and his co-conspirators did, with malice aforethought, commit Sedition and High Treason at Common Law when he signed the European Economic Communities Bill in 1972. The Heath Administration hid this blatant act of treachery under the Official Secrets Act for 30 years where it remained within the National Archives within the Public Records Office, until being released into the public domain in 2002.
A link to a PDF Evidence file along with a Letter to Edward Heath from Lord Kilmuir, are included as evidence of Heath’s Treason (see Exhibits D & E – respectively).
Whereas I have taken this standpoint in law in order to defend the realm and my unalienable Sovereign Rights, which the Common laws and customs of the land protect, and which the English and Commonwealth constitution demands that we all must do at this time, I also have a duty by law to “compel” all others who have not yet transferred their allegiance from the Crown to the Common Law Constitution via the Committee of the Barons, and I must do all that I can to ensure that others do so.
Therefore I DEMAND that you, Chief Constable Andy Cooke, defend the English Crown and Church of England as ordered by Royal Command, and to defend the people who are also doing just that as their lawful duty!
The problem that we people face in these extremely corrupt and dangerous times, is that there are NO AUTHORISED courts of law where the English and Commonwealth Constitution is being observed, therefore it is impossible to remedy thefts, frauds, war crimes, genocide or High Treason etc committed by the state by any peaceful means, which said crimes many English and Commonwealth constitutional subjects are being subjected to, and or being forced to aid and abet at this time.
Whereas the “Courts” (Private Corporate Businesses) are all run by criminally established private corporate enterprise these days, whereby none of them observe the Rule of Law or Due Process of Law within their corrupt tribunal hearings, there is nowhere for the common man/woman to receive remedy against said crimes other than relying on the public service of Police Constables to stand by the truth in law, and their sworn Common Law Oath of Office of Constable, which most (if any) are not doing at this time. You have a duty of care as a public servant to stand under your Oath of Office and the Common Law, and to investigate all allegations of crime in order to protect and serve the public and to keep the Queen/Kings’ peace.
The facts are all completely evidential. England and the Commonwealth’s ancient system of common law is being destroyed by successive quisling governments….if this were not the case then Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 would not have been invoked in accordance with the correct protocols of English and Commonwealth Constitutional law, obviously.
To deny the English and Commonwealth Constitution publicly is also the criminal offence of Sedition at Common law.
Whereas the English Constitutional law has not been taught within universities since the 1970’s when Harold Wilson PM criminally prevented the practice, police today can be forgiven (up to a point) for not understanding the law, but nobody can convincingly say that they were unaware of the facts once they have been formally Notified of them. Ignorance is no defence in law.
As a result of the blatant and evidential general Ignorance by the Police on these URGENT matters of High Treason etc, which have been reported to the police by many people in the past, and evidently so, I can have NO CONFIDENCE in English nor Commonwealth policing within this criminally established administration therefore, I am informing you of my standing so that you are well aware of the facts before any Constable(s) under your direction may attempt to enforce illegal policies or aid and abet those who may seek to do so against me in future. Any Police ‘Officer’ attempting to do so from this day forth shall be treated the same as any common criminal, and I may hold you personally liable for their actions or omissions. We all have the right and duty to self defence and to defend ourselves from coercion to aid and abet crime.
If you ignore this Official and URGENT Notice, or do not respond to the specific points of law addressed herein, and or do not honourably rebut my understandings of the law, in substance if you deem them to be wrong in any way, and within Ten (10) days from your receipt of this ‘Notice Of Lawful Objection & Declaration Of Standing in Law’, then it shall be taken to mean by all interested parties, now and at ANY future time whilst the security clause of Magna Carta remains in effect, that you have no legal/lawful objection to my standing and, that you will prevent Constables from attending the above address in order to aid and abet ANY debt enforcement agent(s), or any third party agents allegedly authorised by the Crown and, that you will ensure that all Police Constables attending the above address are there specifically to assist in any matter, whilst being called by myself or not, who shall assist in keeping the peace in the prevention of crime according to Common law, including but not limited to breaches of the peace, criminal damage, thefts and or coercion to commit crime from taking place.
Your reply must be made on your full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury and, in accordance with your warrant card and Common law Oath of Office of Constable with a duty of care to the public. I also require a clearly legible printed name as well as a wet signature with any correspondence received by you or by your Office.
You are reminded that before any reply to this Notice is provided, please be aware that Sedition is still a crime in England, and that it has NOT been repealed by CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY and remains as law to this day. And that the Parliament has NO IMMUNITY from CRIMINAL ACTS especially Acts of Treason and, that Parliamentary Public Servants are NOT beyond the remit of Police Constables duties under the Common law.
Sincerely, and without vexation, frivolity or ill will, or in any way intended to deceive whatsoever and, with all my Common law unalienable Rights reserved.
The above affirmations and claims are as to my lawful understanding, and which are sworn to on penalty of perjury and on my full commercial liability.
Witnessed by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost:
Subscribed and sworn under the threat of perjury,
without prejudice, all mistakes accepted
with all rights reserved,
In peace and in good faith,
EVIDENCE SENT IN LETTERS SENT ON JUNE 1st 2020. SIGNED FOR JUNE 2nd 2020:
Mayor Joseph Anderson, OBE – Royal Mail Delivery Reference – Click To Check Proof Of Delivery VE539863080GB
Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, Andy Cooke – Royal Mail Delivery Reference – Click To Check Proof Of Delivery VE539863076GB